People v. Mack

140 A.D.3d 843, 31 N.Y.S.3d 897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mack. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 1282
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 2016·No. 2013-04747·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garnett, J.), dated April 10, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level and, thus, properly designated him a level three sex offender (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Gordon, 133 AD3d 835, 836-837 [2015]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]; People v Wragg, 41 AD3d 1273, 1274 [2007]).

Mastro, J.P., Sgroi, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mack, 140 A.D.3d 843, 31 N.Y.S.3d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

140 A.D.3d 843 (People v. Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gordon
133 A.D.3d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Wragg
41 A.D.3d 1273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Wyatt
89 A.D.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)