People v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mack

249 A.D.2d 936, 672 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5031

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 936 (People v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mack, 249 A.D.2d 936, 672 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unani[937]*937mously affirmed.

mously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain identification testimony on the ground that the photo array shown to the identifying witness was unduly suggestive. The fact that two of the 12 individuals whose photographs were shown to the identifying witness did not match the description of defendant does not render the photo array unduly suggestive (see, People v Lee, 207 AD2d 953, 954, lv denied 85 NY2d 864; see generally, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335, cert denied 498 US 833). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unani[937]*937mously affirmed.

mously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain identification testimony on the ground that the photo array shown to the identifying witness was unduly suggestive. The fact that two of the 12 individuals whose photographs were shown to the identifying witness did not match the description of defendant does not render the photo array unduly suggestive (see, People v Lee, 207 AD2d 953, 954, lv denied 85 NY2d 864; see generally, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335, cert denied 498 US 833). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 936, 672 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mack-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack