People v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lee

201 A.D.2d 803, 609 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 803 (People v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lee, 201 A.D.2d 803, 609 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Harris, J.), rendered May 3, 1991 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of [804]*804guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant contends that the 8 to 16-year prison sentence he received as a second felony offender was unduly harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice. We disagree. The sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement and was well within the statutory guidelines. In addition, the plea was in full satisfaction of a three-count indictment. Under the circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by Supreme Court.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Harris, J.), rendered May 3, 1991 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of [804]*804guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant contends that the 8 to 16-year prison sentence he received as a second felony offender was unduly harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice. We disagree. The sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement and was well within the statutory guidelines. In addition, the plea was in full satisfaction of a three-count indictment. Under the circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by Supreme Court.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 803, 609 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lee-nyappdiv-1994.