People v. Lynch

4 A.D.3d 463, 771 N.Y.S.2d 673, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1686
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lynch. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 582

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated September 25, 2002, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lynch, 4 A.D.3d 463, 771 N.Y.S.2d 673, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

4 A.D.3d 463 (People v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)