People v. Love

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Love

199 A.D.2d 1024, 608 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12637

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 1024 (People v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Love, 199 A.D.2d 1024, 608 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the misconduct of the prosecutor during his cross-examination of the alibi witness was so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 401; People v Mott, 94 AD2d 415, 418-419). Defendant’s argument that the trial court erred in failing to compel the People to produce the confidential informant has not been preserved (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review the alleged error in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the misconduct of the prosecutor during his cross-examination of the alibi witness was so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 401; People v Mott, 94 AD2d 415, 418-419). Defendant’s argument that the trial court erred in failing to compel the People to produce the confidential informant has not been preserved (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review the alleged error in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 1024, 608 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-love-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack