People v. Love
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the misconduct of the prosecutor during his cross-examination of the alibi witness was so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 401; People v Mott, 94 AD2d 415, 418-419). Defendant’s argument that the trial court erred in failing to compel the People to produce the confidential informant has not been preserved (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review the alleged error in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
199 A.D.2d 1024 (People v. Love) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.