People v. Love

184 A.D.2d 589

This text of 184 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Love, 184 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), rendered September 29, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that defense counsel’s performance in this case amply met the constitutional standard of meaningful representation. Counsel negotiated a favorable plea agreement permitting the defendant to plead guilty to a reduced charge in exchange for a sentence with the minimum permissible jail term which could be imposed in view of the defendant’s status as a second felony offender (see, People v Candelaria, 139 AD2d 752, 753; People v Paterno, 141 AD2d 771; People v Gale, 130 AD2d 588). Harwood, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gale
130 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Candelaria
139 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Paterno
141 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D.2d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-love-nyappdiv-1992.