People v. Louis Posner

86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.2d 287

This text of 86 A.D.3d 443 (People v. Louis Posner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Louis Posner, 86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.2d 287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[444]*444The court had jurisdiction to decide the issue regarding the release of the seized funds (see CPL 690.55 [1] [a]; Matter of Documents Seized Pursuant to Search Warrant, 124 Misc 2d 897, 899 [1984]). The record belies NYPD’s argument that it was not afforded a full and fair opportunity to be heard before the court directed the release of the subject funds. Furthermore, under the circumstances presented, the court properly exercised its equitable powers to order the release of the funds to pay attorneys’ and experts’ fees (id.).

We have considered NYPD’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Catterson, DeGrasse and Abdul-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Documents Seized Pursuant to a Search Warrant
124 Misc. 2d 897 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.D.3d 443, 926 N.Y.2d 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-louis-posner-nyappdiv-2011.