People v. Lorez

234 N.E.2d 838, 21 N.Y.2d 733

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

21 N.Y.2d 733 (1968)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Robert Lorez, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 3, 1968. Decided January 11, 1968.

James D. Walsh and Samuel L. Scholer for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney (Aaron Nussbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 N.Y.2d 733 (1968)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Robert Lorez, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 3, 1968. Decided January 11, 1968.

James D. Walsh and Samuel L. Scholer for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney (Aaron Nussbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

People v. Lorez, 234 N.E.2d 838, 21 N.Y.2d 733 (N.Y. 1968).

Pincite

234 N.E.2d 838 (People v. Lorez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Roberts

31 N.Y.3d 406 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)