People v. Lopez
This text of 225 A.D.2d 418 (People v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s claim that the trial court’s dismissal of an allegedly sick juror was not supported by an adequate inquiry is unpreserved for review as a matter of law, and, in any event, without merit, there being ample support in the record for the court’s enunciated reason for dismissing the juror, namely, that the juror would be out at least two days, long enough to delay completion of the trial by a least a week because of an approaching three-day weekend and risk losing other jurors whose continued availability was uncertain. The court correctly imposed consecutive sentences for defendant’s separate and distinct acts of assault and sodomy. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 418, 640 N.Y.2d 485, 640 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lopez-nyappdiv-1996.