People v. Lopez

200 A.D.2d 525, 606 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 525 (People v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lopez, 200 A.D.2d 525, 606 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Howard Bell, J.), rendered August 21, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to 2 terms of 5 to 10 years, and 1 term of 1 year, respectively, all to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence that she intentionally aided her codefendant by, at least, acting as a lookout during the sale (People v Kaplan, 6 NY2d 140).

Since defendant’s intent to aid in the sale was at issue, evidence of an uncharged sale was admissible as to the charged sale itself as well as to the charge of possession with intent to sell (People v Carter, 77 NY2d 95, 107, cert denied 499 US 967).

Defendant was not entitled to a circumstantial evidence charge because the case did not rest entirely on circumstantial evidence (People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375, 379-381). Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find them without merit.

Defendant’s sentence, which was only slightly greater than the minimum mandated for a second felony offender, was not excessive. Concur — Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SLADE, HANDY, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Slade
133 A.D.3d 1203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Kearse
215 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Sills
215 A.D.2d 412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Catten
214 A.D.2d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Semper
207 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Marte
207 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 A.D.2d 525, 606 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lopez-nyappdiv-1994.