People v. Lopez
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered October 8, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his application to withdraw his guilty plea without first conducting an evidentiary hearing (see, People v Billings, 208 AD2d 941; People v Ladelokun, 192 AD2d 723; People v Pettway, 140 [546]*546AD2d 721, 722). The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily chose to plead guilty, after consulting with counsel. Moreover, although he was afforded a reasonable opportunity to set forth the grounds upon which his application was premised, the defendant merely proclaimed that he was innocent, despite his explicit admissions of guilt at the plea proceeding. Since the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was based upon unsubstantiated assertions of innocence, the court acted well within its discretion in refusing to conduct further inquiry before denying the application (see, People v Billings, supra; People v Smith, 157 AD2d 871). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
209 A.D.2d 545 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.