People v. Longtin

272 A.D.2d 781, 708 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 781 (People v. Longtin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Longtin, 272 A.D.2d 781, 708 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered February 1, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and was charged by a superior court information with two counts of attempted murder in the second degree and one count of burglary in the second degree as a result of his involvement in two attempts to kill his grandfather. He thereafter pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the second degree in full satisfaction of the charges [782]*782against him. County Court denied defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of IV2 to 4V2 years in prison. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. It is well settled that “[t]he granting of youthful offender treatment rests entirely with the court’s discretion and depends upon the facts of each individual case” (People v Diaz, 221 AD2d 749, 750, lv denied 87 NY2d 921). A review of the sentencing transcript indicates that County Court considered the relevant factors including the negative recommendation of the Probation Department as well as the serious nature of the crime in making its determination (see, People v Mettler, 259 AD2d 834; People v Diaz, supra; People v Hayes, 115 AD2d 910). Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion in County Court’s denial of youthful offender status.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. La Parl
276 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 781, 708 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-longtin-nyappdiv-2000.