People v. Hayes

110 A.D.2d 1035, 489 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48909

This text of 110 A.D.2d 1035 (People v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hayes, 110 A.D.2d 1035, 489 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Although the prosecutor improperly made reference to the fact that the missing witness testified before the Grand Jury and paraphrased what she had told the police the night she was robbed, in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, we find the error to be harmless (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). We have reviewed defendant’s other claims of error on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Wolfgang, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.2d 1035, 489 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hayes-nyappdiv-1985.