People v. Logan

188 N.W.2d 643, 32 Mich. App. 354, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1907
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1971·No. 10126·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

32 Mich. App. 354 (1971)
188 N.W.2d 643

PEOPLE
v.
LOGAN

Docket No. 10126.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 2, 1971.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Luvenia D. Dockett, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Carl Ziemba, for defendant on appeal.

*355 Before: DANHOF, P.J., and HOLBROOK and BRONSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After a nonjury trial the defendant was convicted of attempted larceny from a person, MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287) and MCLA § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). He now contends that the people failed to indorse two alleged res gestae witnesses.

The identity of one of the witnesses became known at the preliminary examination and the defendant did not move that his name be indorsed or demand his production. This issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal. People v. Rimson (1966), 3 Mich App 713; People v. Printess C. Jackson (1968), 11 Mich App 727.

The record does not show that the second witness was in fact a res gestae witness. Also, even if he were a res gestae witness, his identity became known at the trial and the defendant did not move that his name be indorsed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Logan, 188 N.W.2d 643, 32 Mich. App. 354, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1907 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

188 N.W.2d 643 (People v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ingram
192 N.W.2d 647 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)