People v. Logan

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Logan

32 Mich. App. 354

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 2, 1971

DocketDocket No. 10126

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 Mich. App. 354 (People v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Logan, 32 Mich. App. 354 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a non jury trial the defendant was convicted of attempted larceny from a person, MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Eev § 28.287) and MCLA § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Eev § 28.589). He now contends that the people failed to indorse two alleged res gestae witnesses.

The identity of one of the witnesses became known at the preliminary examination and the defendant did not move that his name be indorsed or demand his production. This issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal. People v. Rimson (1966), 3 Mich App 713; People v. Printess C. Jackson (1968), 11 Mich App 727.

The record does not show that the second witness was in fact a res gestae witness. Also, even if he were a res gestae witness, his identity became known at the trial and the defendant did not move that his name be indorsed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After a non jury trial the defendant was convicted of attempted larceny from a person, MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Eev § 28.287) and MCLA § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Eev § 28.589). He now contends that the people failed to indorse two alleged res gestae witnesses.

The identity of one of the witnesses became known at the preliminary examination and the defendant did not move that his name be indorsed or demand his production. This issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal. People v. Rimson (1966), 3 Mich App 713; People v. Printess C. Jackson (1968), 11 Mich App 727.

The record does not show that the second witness was in fact a res gestae witness. Also, even if he were a res gestae witness, his identity became known at the trial and the defendant did not move that his name be indorsed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Mich. App. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-logan-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack