People v. Little

431 N.E.2d 966, 55 N.Y.2d 770, 447 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3298
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Objection to the question whether the witness had been previously arrested was properly sustained (Richardson, Evidence [10th ed — Prince], § 506; Fisch, New York Law of Evidence [2d ed], § 458). So far as defense counsel sought to question about a charge adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, he did no more than ask for time to find out what the final disposition of the charge was and never followed up on it. Thus, the issue was not preserved for our consideration.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Little, 431 N.E.2d 966, 55 N.Y.2d 770, 447 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3298 (N.Y. 1981).

431 N.E.2d 966 (People v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Isidron
209 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Serrano
203 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Cruz v. Scully
716 F. Supp. 766 (S.D. New York, 1989)