People v. Serrano
This text of 203 A.D.2d 395 (People v. Serrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), rendered July 26, 1990, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant does not contend that there was any error in the violation of probation proceeding which resulted in the amended judgment. Although the defendant alleges error in the original allocution which culminated in the underlying [396]*396judgment, that proceeding is not properly before this Court on the appeal from the amended judgment (People v Heckstall, 65 AD2d 581; People v Lugo, 176 AD2d 177). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 A.D.2d 395, 612 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-serrano-nyappdiv-1994.