People v. Lisenba

California Court of Appeal

People v. Lisenba

61 P.2d 345, 17 Cal. App. 2d 42, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 521

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 13, 1936

DocketCrim. No. 2894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 P.2d 345 (People v. Lisenba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lisenba, 61 P.2d 345, 17 Cal. App. 2d 42, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

CRAIL, P. J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of incest, a felony. The clerk’s transcript was filed on June [43]*4319, 1936. The reporter’s transcript was filed July 3, 1936, and the ease was ordered on the calendar for August 14, 1936, and due notice given. At the request of defendant the case has been continued six times, the last continuance being to October 9, 1936. The continuance to that date was at the request of the defendant and with full notice and knowledge on his part. At the hearing on that date the defendant did not appear. Neither has a brief been filed on behalf of appellant. Under authority of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRAIL, P. J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of incest, a felony. The clerk’s transcript was filed on June [43]*4319, 1936. The reporter’s transcript was filed July 3, 1936, and the ease was ordered on the calendar for August 14, 1936, and due notice given. At the request of defendant the case has been continued six times, the last continuance being to October 9, 1936. The continuance to that date was at the request of the defendant and with full notice and knowledge on his part. At the hearing on that date the defendant did not appear. Neither has a brief been filed on behalf of appellant. Under authority of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 P.2d 345, 17 Cal. App. 2d 42, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lisenba-calctapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack