People v. Licea
This text of 44 A.D.3d 690 (People v. Licea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed April 20, 2004, upon his conviction of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that his resentencing as a persistent violent felony offender violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]) is without merit (see Almendarez-Torres v United States, 523 US 224, 244 [1998]; Penal Law § 70.08 [1] [a]; People v Adelman, 36 AD3d 926, 928 [2007]; People v Highsmith, 21 AD3d 1037, 1038-1039 [2005]; People v Brown, 16 AD3d 430, 431 [2005]; People v Renna, 13 AD3d 398 [2004]). Miller, J.P., Skelos, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.D.3d 690, 841 N.Y.S.2d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-licea-nyappdiv-2007.