People v. Lendeborg

2023 NY Slip Op 01850
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 6, 2023
DocketInd. No. 2884/05 Appeal No. 17660 Case No. 2016-02075
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 01850 (People v. Lendeborg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lendeborg, 2023 NY Slip Op 01850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Lendeborg (2023 NY Slip Op 01850)
People v Lendeborg
2023 NY Slip Op 01850
Decided on April 06, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 06, 2023
Before: Kapnick, J.P., Friedman, Moulton, Kennedy, JJ.

Ind. No. 2884/05 Appeal No. 17660 Case No. 2016-02075

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Nelson Lendeborg, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elizabeth B. Emmons of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J. at hearing and adjudication; Neil E. Ross, J. at order), entered on or about June 23, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). We do not find any overassessment of points regarding defendant's felony drug conviction, which occurred less than three years before the instant sex offenses. The mitigating factors cited by defendant were generally taken into account by the guidelines. Defendant's response to sex offender treatment was unexceptional, and he has not shown that his age or his low score on the STATIC-99 test demonstrates a reduced individual danger to public safety (see e.g. People v Rodriguez, 145 AD3d 489, 490 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 916 [2017]). In any event, the alleged mitigating factors are outweighed by the seriousness of defendant's multiple acts of sexual abuse against young children. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 6, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lendeborg
2023 NY Slip Op 01850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 01850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lendeborg-nyappdiv-2023.