People v. Leddy
This text of 47 A.D.3d 842 (People v. Leddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered May 31, 2005, convicting him of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 (2), beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Toussaint, 40 AD3d 1017 [2007]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A.D.3d 842, 849 N.Y.S.2d 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-leddy-nyappdiv-2008.