People v. Lawrence

247 A.D.2d 635, 669 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1772
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lawrence. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 A.D.2d 893

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenweig, J.), rendered July 14, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgement is affirmed.

The defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 to vacate the judgment was properly denied. It is well settled that “[t]here is no form of proof so unreliable as recanting testimony” (People v Shilitano, 218 NY 161, 170). Under the circumstances of this case, where the defendant made a statement which positively identified him as the individual who relieved the complainant of his jewelry at gunpoint, the complainant’s recantation would probably not change the result if a new trial were granted, and the court properly denied the defendant’s motion without a hearing (see, People v Turner, 215 AD2d 703; People v Rodriguez, 201 AD2d 683; People v Donald, 107 AD2d 818).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lawrence, 247 A.D.2d 635, 669 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 635 (People v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Shilitano
112 N.E. 733 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
People v. Donald
107 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Rodriguez
201 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Turner
215 A.D.2d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)