People v. Lawrence

217 A.D.2d 902, 631 N.Y.S.2d 258, 629 N.Y.S.2d 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lawrence. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 A.D.2d 969
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1995·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

—Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, we affirm defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. We reject the contention of defendant that the verdict finding him guilty of that crime is against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Remittitur from Court of Appeals—Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Balio, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lawrence, 217 A.D.2d 902, 631 N.Y.S.2d 258, 629 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 902 (People v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)