People v. Lawrence

199 A.D.2d 283, 605 N.Y.S.2d 943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lawrence. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 A.D.2d 969

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), rendered June 30,1992, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of conviction is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Finally, the defendant’s contention that his sentence is excessive is without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lawrence, 199 A.D.2d 283, 605 N.Y.S.2d 943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 283 (People v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)