People v. Larkins

229 N.W.2d 378, 59 Mich. App. 199, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1337
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 25, 1975
DocketDocket 20656
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 229 N.W.2d 378 (People v. Larkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Larkins, 229 N.W.2d 378, 59 Mich. App. 199, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1337 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

While in prison on a prior, unrelated offense, the defendant was charged with assault with intent to commit gross indecency, MCLA 750.85; MSA 28.280. Pursuant to an agreement with the prosecuting attorney the defendant on July 5, 1973, pled guilty to the lesser offense of attempted assault with intent to commit gross indecency and was sentenced to a term in prison of from 1 to 5 years to be served consecutively with his current term. He appeals as of right raising two issues, neither of which require reversal.

Defendant first claims that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to inform him that his sentence for the instant offense, at the discretion of the court, could be imposed consecutively.

From June of 1967 until June of 1973 our Supreme Court, with the cooperation and participation of the bench and bar of Michigan, was involved in an exhaustive study of the plea-taking [201]*201process.1 The result was the adoption of an amended GCR 1963, 785, which became effective June 1, 1973.

While this rule was in the process of development the Supreme Court considered and rejected language in the ABA Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty which required the court to inform the defendant of the possible effect on the maximum sentence resulting from the imposition of consecutive sentences.2

A comparison of the relevant sections of the ABA Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty (Approved Draft, 1968), and GCR 1963, 785, as amended effective June 1,1973, is illustrative.

ABA Standards:

"1.4 Defendant to be advised by court.
"The court shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere from a defendant without first addressing the defendant personally and * * *
"(c) informing him:
"(i) of the maximum possible sentence on the charge including that possible from consecutive sentences; (Emphasis added.)
"(ii) of the mandatory minimum sentence, if any, on the charge;”

GCR 1963, 785.7:__

[202]*202"(1) Advice by the Court. The court shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without first personally addressing the defendant and informing him of and determining that he understands the following:
"(b) the maximum sentence and the mandatory minimum sentence, if any,, for the offense to which the plea is offered;”

During the plea taking proceeding the following colloquy took place between the court and the defendant.

"The Court: [T]he maximum penalty for this offense is five years. Do you understand that?
"The Defendant: Yes.”

This complies with the rule. We decline therefore to add by judicial construction what the Supreme Court omitted in drafting.

Defendant next argues that it was reversible error to accept a plea to the non-existent offense of attempted assault with intent to commit gross indecency. We disagree. Accepting a guilty plea to a non-existent or so-called paradoxical offense as a part of the plea bargaining process does not automatically mandate reversal. People v Hooper, 58 Mich App 132; 227 NW2d 250 (1975). Although this practice should not be encouraged, we do not find that the ends of justice require reversal here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Woeltje
317 N.W.2d 230 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Solomon
305 N.W.2d 295 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Mitchell
302 N.W.2d 230 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Cummings
269 N.W.2d 658 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Bennett
256 N.W.2d 459 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Matulonis
230 N.W.2d 347 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Thompson
230 N.W.2d 12 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Larkins
229 N.W.2d 378 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 N.W.2d 378, 59 Mich. App. 199, 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-larkins-michctapp-1975.