People v. Langdon

California Court of Appeal

People v. Langdon

250 Cal. App. 2d 595, 58 Cal. Rptr. 546, 1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2143

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 1, 1967

DocketCrim. No. 13473

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 250 Cal. App. 2d 595 (People v. Langdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Langdon, 250 Cal. App. 2d 595, 58 Cal. Rptr. 546, 1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2143 (Cal. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Appellant is attempting to appeal from an order of the superior court denying his motion to vacate the judgment. The record shows that the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of California, People v. Langdon, 52 Cal.2d 425 [341 P.2d 303],

The superior court was without jurisdiction. (Pen. Code, § 1265.) The order of the superior court is not appealable, and the record on appeal should not have been prepared.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Appellant is attempting to appeal from an order of the superior court denying his motion to vacate the judgment. The record shows that the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of California, People v. Langdon, 52 Cal.2d 425 [341 P.2d 303],

The superior court was without jurisdiction. (Pen. Code, § 1265.) The order of the superior court is not appealable, and the record on appeal should not have been prepared.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 Cal. App. 2d 595, 58 Cal. Rptr. 546, 1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-langdon-calctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack