People v. Land
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered November 4, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover,, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
221 A.D.2d 566 (People v. Land) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.