People v. Land

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Land

190 A.D.2d 690

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Land) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Land, 190 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered December 9, 1988, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of. that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness of his guilty plea is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Mackey, 77 NY2d 846, 847), and in any event, is wdthout merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered December 9, 1988, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of. that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness of his guilty plea is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Mackey, 77 NY2d 846, 847), and in any event, is wdthout merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-land-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack