People v. King

2017 NY Slip Op 4716, 151 A.D.3d 1759, 53 N.Y.S.3d 854
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2017·No. 800 KA 14-00669·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered November 27, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and assault in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]) and assault in the third degree (§ 120.00). Defendant’s contention that reversal of the judgment and vacatur of the plea are required because he was not advised that his enhanced sentence could include a term of postrelease supervision is not preserved for our review. Defendant had a reasonable opportunity to challenge the validity of his guilty plea on the same ground now advanced on appeal, or to move to withdraw the plea or otherwise to object to the imposition of postrelease supervision, and he failed to do so (see People v Williams, 27 NY3d 212, 214 [2016]; People v Crowder, 24 NY3d 1134, 1136-1137 [2015]).

Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Carni, Curran and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 2017 NY Slip Op 4716, 151 A.D.3d 1759, 53 N.Y.S.3d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4716 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Piwowar
2020 NY Slip Op 1728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)