People v. King

123 A.D.3d 738, 995 N.Y.S.2d 917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 3, 2014·No. 2007-06857·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Holdman, J.), imposed June 29, 2006, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that appeal is dismissed as academic.

The defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v Nicholson, *739 31 AD3d 468, 469 [2006]; People v Anderson, 168 AD2d 624, 624 [1990]), as the defendant has fully served his sentence (see People v Nicholson, 31 AD3d at 469; People v Anderson, 168 AD2d at 624). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 123 A.D.3d 738, 995 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

123 A.D.3d 738 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vasquez
2019 NY Slip Op 1625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Vielman
2018 NY Slip Op 5708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Davis (Tina)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017