People v. King
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Holdman, J.), imposed June 29, 2006, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that appeal is dismissed as academic.
The defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v Nicholson, *739 31 AD3d 468, 469 [2006]; People v Anderson, 168 AD2d 624, 624 [1990]), as the defendant has fully served his sentence (see People v Nicholson, 31 AD3d at 469; People v Anderson, 168 AD2d at 624). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
123 A.D.3d 738 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.