People v. King

22 A.D.3d 506, 801 N.Y.S.2d 537
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 14, 2003 (People v King, 307 AD2d 302 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 24, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 [507]*507US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 22 A.D.3d 506, 801 N.Y.S.2d 537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

22 A.D.3d 506 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Artus
259 F. App'x 346 (Second Circuit, 2008)