People v. King

269 A.D.2d 408, 704 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 232 A.D.2d 111

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered April 7, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court properly determined that the race-neutral reason offered by the prosecutor for striking a black prospective juror was not pretextual as the prosecutor clearly related the prospective juror’s work and family background to the facts of the case (see, People v Richie, 217 AD2d 84).

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s summation remarks were improper is largely unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Saks, 256 AD2d 479).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 269 A.D.2d 408, 704 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 408 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Richie
217 A.D.2d 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Saks
256 A.D.2d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)