People v. King
110 A.D.2d 856, 488 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48767
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1985·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
[857]*857Under the circumstances of this case, Criminal Term did not err in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas without conducting an evidentiary hearing (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 524-525; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927). Defendant’s claim that he was “high” at the time that the pleas were entered is belied by the record of the plea allocutions and, thus, cannot support the relief requested (cf. People v Bangert, 107 AD2d 752). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. King, 110 A.D.2d 856, 488 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 856 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Curtis
248 A.D.2d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Rivera
150 A.D.2d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Losicco
137 A.D.2d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Braun
133 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)