People v. King

92 A.D.2d 941, 460 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17355
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 A.D.2d 992

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered December 23,1981, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. The defendant was contacted by counsel and asked what issue he wished raised. He has failed to offer any. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. King, 92 A.D.2d 941, 460 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

92 A.D.2d 941 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)