People v. King
933 N.E.2d 200, 15 N.Y.3d 736, 906 N.Y.S.2d 802
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of County Court should be reversed, defendant’s motion to suppress granted and the case remitted to Batavia Town Court for further proceedings on the accusatory instruments.
County Court’s findings that “the police had no cause to initially stop” defendant and that “it cannot be concluded that defendant stopped voluntarily” have support in the record and are therefore beyond this Court’s further review. Accordingly, any evidence flowing from the stop must be suppressed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. King, 933 N.E.2d 200, 15 N.Y.3d 736, 906 N.Y.S.2d 802 (N.Y. 2010).
933 N.E.2d 200 (People v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. King
933 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)