People v. Killeen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Killeen

198 A.D.2d 233, 603 N.Y.S.2d 510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 233 (People v. Killeen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Killeen, 198 A.D.2d 233, 603 N.Y.S.2d 510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered April 30, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s argument that New York’s statutory scheme (Penal Law § 10.00 [18]; § 30.00 [2]; CPL 1.20 [42]; 180.75, 210.43), which permits persons between the ages of 13 and 15 who commit serious violations of the Penal Law to be treated differently than those young persons who commit nonserious violations, violates the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions (see, People v Ryals, 100 Misc 2d 551). Further, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered April 30, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s argument that New York’s statutory scheme (Penal Law § 10.00 [18]; § 30.00 [2]; CPL 1.20 [42]; 180.75, 210.43), which permits persons between the ages of 13 and 15 who commit serious violations of the Penal Law to be treated differently than those young persons who commit nonserious violations, violates the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions (see, People v Ryals, 100 Misc 2d 551). Further, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 233, 603 N.Y.S.2d 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-killeen-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack