People v. Kessner

181 A.D.2d 1044
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1992·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: It was not error for the court to enhance defendant’s sentence, without a hearing, beyond that originally negotiated in the plea agreement. At the plea proceeding the court conditioned its promised sentence upon the defendant "staying out of trouble” pending sentencing. While waiting to be sentenced, defendant was arrested for crimes involving a threatening telephone call to his former girlfriend, who had obtained an order of protection against him. Since defendant did not deny making the call and the contact was specifically prohibited by the protection order then in effect, a hearing was not necessary (see, People v Redman, 148 AD2d 966). Accordingly, the court was not bound by its promised sentence and was free to impose a greater sentence (see, People v Brooks, 154 AD2d 931; People v Caridi, 148 AD2d 625, 626). There is no merit to defendant’s appeal from the court’s order denying his motion to set aside the sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20. Defendant’s remaining con[1045] tentions lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — Attempted Criminal Mischief, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Law-ton and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kessner, 181 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

181 A.D.2d 1044 (People v. Kessner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ayen
55 A.D.3d 1305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Capuano
252 A.D.2d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Kessner v. Dupras
826 F. Supp. 657 (W.D. New York, 1993)
People v. Kessner
181 A.D.2d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)