People v. Kelly

85 A.D.3d 819, 924 N.Y.S.2d 812
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 1520

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), imposed March 19, 2010, pursuant to CPL 440.46, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, which [820]*820sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on December 16, 1997.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in resentencing the defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment of nine years with three years of postrelease supervision on the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and a concurrent determinate term of imprisonment of five years with three years of post-release supervision on the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (see People v Newton, 48 AD3d 115, 119-120 [2007]). Under the circumstances of this case, a reduction of the resentence is not warranted (see People v Tutt, 82 AD3d 1273 [2011]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825, 826 [2007]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kelly, 85 A.D.3d 819, 924 N.Y.S.2d 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

85 A.D.3d 819 (People v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Almanzar
43 A.D.3d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Newton
48 A.D.3d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Tutt
82 A.D.3d 1273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)