People v. Kellar

159 A.D.2d 977, 552 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3278
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kellar. Read the opinion of the Court — 174 A.D.2d 848

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s convictions for grand larceny in the second degree and misuse of food stamps (see, Penal Law §§ 155.35, 20.00; Social Services Law § 147; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The People established that defendant was employed and resided in the marital residence during the period in question. Defendant’s wife and child received public assistance based on information that defendant did not reside with the family. It was undisputed at trial that if defendant’s income during the 21/i-year period in question had been considered in computing his wife’s grant, the family would not have been eligible for public assistance benefits. Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct were unpreserved for review and do not require reversal in any event. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — grand larceny, second degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kellar, 159 A.D.2d 977, 552 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 977 (People v. Kellar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)