People v. Kearney
266 A.D.2d 862, 698 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kearney. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D.2d 638 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1999·Published
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The negotiated sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, People v Kohler, 147 AD2d 937, lv denied 73 NY2d 1017). Contrary to the contention of the People, defendant need not preserve his right to appeal the harshness of the negotiated sentence (see, People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264, 268). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Green, Pine, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Kearney, 266 A.D.2d 862, 698 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
266 A.D.2d 862 (People v. Kearney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Pollenz
493 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Kohler
147 A.D.2d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)