People v. Kohler
147 A.D.2d 937, 538 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1176
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1989·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. Defendant received the sentence for which he had freely bargained (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306; People v Martinez, 124 AD2d 505, 506). We have considered the remaining issues raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief and find each one of them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. —sodomy, first degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Kohler, 147 A.D.2d 937, 538 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
147 A.D.2d 937 (People v. Kohler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hogan
269 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Kearney
266 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Butler
261 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Cotton
219 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Tejeda
217 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Fair
191 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)