People v. Julius
This text of 246 A.D.2d 442 (People v. Julius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Donnino, J.), rendered September 7, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490), and we reject defendant’s “masked repugnancy” argument based on his acquittal of the sale count and of one of the possession counts (see, People v Downing, 225 AD2d 391, lv denied 88 NY2d 965).
The conclusory allegations set forth in defendant’s moving papers were insufficient to warrant conducting a Mapp hearing. Defendant’s allegations were not tantamount to a denial of selling drugs to the undercover officer (compare, People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 430, with People v Bailey, 218 AD2d 569, 571). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D.2d 442, 667 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-julius-nyappdiv-1998.