People v. Judd
This text of 29 A.D.3d 431 (People v. Judd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order,Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Levine Sussman, J.), entered on or about April 12, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record supports the court’s independent finding, following a recommendation by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, that defendant should be designated a level three sex offender, based on his prior felony sex crime conviction, which is a presumptive overriding factor under the Board’s guidelines (see People v Scott, 288 AD2d 763 [2001]). Defendant’s 1985 and 1992 felony convictions both involved sex crimes against children. The danger of future recidivism evinced by this past recidivism outweighs the various mitigating factors argued by defendant, such as the absence of recent criminal activity, and the court properly concluded that defendant’s present circumstances did not warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guarnan, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.3d 431, 814 N.Y.S.2d 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-judd-nyappdiv-2006.