People v. Agnew

68 A.D.3d 526, 889 N.Y.2d 451
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The court properly applied the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, and properly denied defendant’s request for a downward departure (see People v Judd, 29 AD3d 431 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 709 [2006]). There is no support for defendant’s position that the override was not intended to apply when one of the felonies involved an undercover operation, rather than an actual underage victim. Defendant’s conduct demonstrated a high risk of sexual recidivism, not lessened by the fact that the crime was only an attempt, or the fact that the intended victim, believed by defendant to be a child, was actually an undercover officer. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Agnew, 68 A.D.3d 526, 889 N.Y.2d 451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 526 (People v. Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DeDona
102 A.D.3d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)