People v. Joseph
This text of 30 A.D.3d 248 (People v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of resen[249]*249tence, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), rendered July 12, 2005, resentencing defendant, upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, as a second felony offender, to a term of 13V2 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant was resentenced from a term of 15 years to life to a term of 13V2 years pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738). We perceive no basis for a further reduction. Defendant’s argument that his conviction should be reduced to second-degree possession is without merit (People v Quinones, 22 AD3d 218 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]; People v Nelson, 21 AD3d 861 [2005], Lv granted 6 NY3d 757 [2005]), as is his constitutional challenge to the procedure under which he was sentenced as a second felony offender (Almendarez-Torres v United States, 523 US 224 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Sweeny, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.3d 248, 816 N.Y.S.2d 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-joseph-nyappdiv-2006.