People v. Joseph

271 A.D.2d 698, 707 N.Y.S.2d 855, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4473
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered April 2, 1998, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the de[699]*699fendant (see, People v Martin, 59 NY2d 704, 705), the trial court properly refused to charge assault in the third degree (see, Penal Law § 120.00 [2]) as a lesser-included offense. Under the facts of this case, no reasonable view of the evidence supports the conclusion that the defendant recklessly caused physical injury to the complainant (see, People v Long, 259 AD2d 634; People v Wheeler, 234 AD2d 573; People v Zayas, 140 AD2d 395).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Joseph, 271 A.D.2d 698, 707 N.Y.S.2d 855, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 698 (People v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Artis
63 A.D.3d 1174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)