People v. Joseph
This text of 253 A.D.2d 529 (People v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered December 5, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[530]*530Since the defendant failed to object to the trial court’s justification charge, this issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gurganious, 214 AD2d 681). In any event, the court’s charge, which followed the pattern jury instructions almost verbatim (see, 1 CJI[NY] 35.15 [2] [a], at 876-879), viewed in its entirety, adequately conveyed the appropriate standard to the jury (see, People v Wesley, 76 NY2d 555, 561; People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96; People v Martinez, 243 AD2d 732).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Miller, J. P., Altman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D.2d 529, 676 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-joseph-nyappdiv-1998.