People v. Jose T.

58 Cal. App. 4th 1218, 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 471, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8400, 97 Daily Journal DAR 13527, 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 888
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 30, 1997
DocketB107974
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 58 Cal. App. 4th 1218 (People v. Jose T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jose T., 58 Cal. App. 4th 1218, 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 471, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8400, 97 Daily Journal DAR 13527, 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 888 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinions

[1220]*1220Opinion

ORTEGA, Acting P. J.

Teenager Melvin Jones did not have a good day. Defendant fired four shots at the car in which Jones was a passenger, fortunately missing each time. The driver took Jones to his grandmother’s house. Later that night, Jones wanted to visit his uncle. Knowing a gang was planning a party nearby, he determined to avoid problems by inconspicuously taking the bus. It was not a wise move. While he waited at the bus stop, defendant and a confederate accosted him and beat him. As Jones fought back, defendant hit him over the head with a handgun and fired two shots. Fortunately, Jones was not shot, although he suffered a head injury that required brief hospital treatment.

Defendant did not leave the general area. Police responding to the scene of the beating found defendant around the comer. Defendant tried to discard the gun when he saw officers approaching.

The trial court sustained a juvenile petition alleging assault with a semiautomatic weapon (count 1), assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (count 2), and possession of a firearm (count 3). The court committed defendant to the Youth Authority.

Discussion

Defendant raises sentencing contentions, which respondent concedes, requiring remand. We agree, except as to the question of whether count 3 is a straight misdemeanor. We find it to be a “wobbler.” We remand.

I, II

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re L.M. CA6
California Court of Appeal, 2014
In re K.P. CA5
California Court of Appeal, 2014
In re A.Z. CA2/2
California Court of Appeal, 2014
In re C.G. CA6
California Court of Appeal, 2013
People v. Jose T.
58 Cal. App. 4th 1218 (California Court of Appeal, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cal. App. 4th 1218, 68 Cal. Rptr. 2d 471, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8400, 97 Daily Journal DAR 13527, 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jose-t-calctapp-1997.