People v. Jordan
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered November 9, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s contention that his plea was not voluntarily entered has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law since he did not move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v Butler, 200 AD2d 515, Iv denied 83 NY2d 850), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to reach this contention, we would affirm. Defendant was charged under a single indictment with two counts of robbery in the first degree and one count of attempted first degree robbery. Defendant is correct in arguing that prior to pleading guilty he was misadvised by the court that the maximum period for the attempted first degree robbery count could be 12 Vi to 25 years. Nevertheless, we reject defendant’s claim that he would have gone to trial had he been told that he could be sentenced to as much as [258]*25832 to 65 years instead of 37 to 75 years, especially since his desire to plead guilty in exchange for the negotiated sentence of 8 to 16 years was clearly established on the record prior to the court’s remark (see, People v Durran, 210 AD2d 34, Iv denied 84 NY2d 1031). The record is clear that defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
215 A.D.2d 257 (People v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.