People v. Jordan
This text of 201 A.D.2d 961 (People v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his motion for a suppression hearing. The record establishes that defendant withdrew that motion and thus there is no ruling to review.
The court properly received testimony by a witness concerning an incident that occurred when the witness, defendant and codefendant Henry were all present in a room at the Monroe County Jail. The witness testified that, when a man walked by, the codefendant said that that was the person they had shot, and that both defendant and the codefendant thereupon "ducked down.” The testimony concerning the words of the codefendant was not offered for the truth of its content but, rather, to explain the subsequent action of defendant (see, People v Salko, 47 NY2d 230, 239-240, mot to amend remittitur granted 47 NY2d 1010).
Defendant’s remaining argument is unpreserved and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D.2d 961, 607 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jordan-nyappdiv-1994.